Discussion about this post

User's avatar
钟建英's avatar

Hi, thanks for this essay. So admirable of Dr Cao to work in Africa. HIs example seems to show us that we don't need to fear becoming "redundant", especially when there is so much poverty in the world.

I personally don't see why we should fear "redundancy" due to technology and automation. If a country's economy does in fact reach a state where all productive work can be done by machines and AI, then a sensible government policy is to tax income from capital, and pay everyone a basic universal income; this way, every one can decide for themselves how they live worthwhile lives. Some may choose to excel in the arts (e.g., music, literary work, artistic work), others could excel in sports, still others could devote their lives to research (in physics, biology, etc), others could excel in acting, journalism, etc. There is so many ways we can live worthwhile lives. So we should welcome "redundancy"!

The basic issue is that we need a government to tax income from capital, and distribute the income in a way that continues to encourage innovation. There's no need for equal distribution of income from capital; the universal basic income just needs to cover people's basic cost of living, so we are not afraid to "take risks" when exploring ways to live worthwhile lives.

So many of us (myself included) dare not pursue careers that we truly have an interest in, ending up as accountants, engineers, etc, when we would have preferred to be garderners, zoologists, mathematicians, linguists, etc.

The problem with the Western political system is that their governments are unable to even to address the poverty within their own societies, despite how wealthy the society is as a whole. Western "liberal values" focus on "procedural freedoms" (e.g., free speech, free media, etc), but neglect "opportunity freedoms" (e.g., freedom from hunger, freedom from illiteracy, etc). Their "free market" ideology prevents their governments from addressing market failures. So the wealthy people in the West end up feeling bored, spending their excess wealth on trivialities, not on worthwhile projects.

Expand full comment
Dors's avatar

From the translation :

" Not just food, but other industrial products closely related to people's lives, including clothing, daily necessities, small home appliances, and even big items like cars - if you don't care about their brands and "face value" and only focus on their functionality and practicality, you'll find that their prices are not expensive at all."

Expensive is a word that refers to products. It is prices that are high or low... So, when prices are high, products are expensive.

"In today's era of material production excess, more and more people trained as material producers are gradually finding that they're no longer truly needed by society. "

In the West, some critics of the Western system call this line of reasoning a gross distortion, a result of gaslighting, a pure psychological manipulation by the sick establishment.

To say that human beings are redundant because of the tools that they created to serve them - an absurdity.

Even if we were to imagine that human beings are mere robots made of metal, they would be more valued than in this scheme.

In this context, what is the reason that China is on the course of massively expanding the production robots that are humanoid?

And ironically, some of the said critics of the West look up to China as providing an alternative that is healthy.

...

Would you please provide a link to Dr. Cao Fengze on Zhihu?

You said you secured an opportunity to meet Dr Fengze.

Is it for an interview?

If so, is the interview yet to happen?

I wonder if Dr. Cao Fengze and/or his wife have read Albert Schweitzer. And how are they acquainted with his work and the experiences of his team in Africa?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts