Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Warwick Powell's avatar

Thanks Fred, for this nice summary of the Chinese readout from today's summit. If I may add, the framing of "constructive strategic stability" needs also to be understood as a response to the questions posed at the outset, and particularly the question of escaping the Thucydides Trap. This counterposition is central to understanding the significance of the agreement on the notion of "constructive strategic stability" because the TT concept is premised on an ontology of inter-state relations that stands in stark contrast to the ontology underpinning the four proposals - development, security, civilisation and governance. What has been advanced - even if in words alone for now - is the idea of inter-state relations that operates on a more Chinese-defined ontological foundation, in which interests are permanently intertwined. This conceptualisation transcends the dualism of the Thucydides Trap. Let's see how this plays out in practice.

Godfree Roberts's avatar

Great backgrounder! Many thanks.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?